The Rise and Fall of Hope and Change

The Rise and Fall of Hope and Change



Alexis de Toqueville

The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.
Alexis de Tocqueville

The United States Capitol Building

The United States Capitol Building

The Constitutional Convention

The Constitutional Convention

The Continental Congress

The Continental Congress

George Washington at Valley Forge

George Washington at Valley Forge


Friday, January 28, 2011

Obama stung By SOTU Plagiarism Rap

From The American Thinker:

January 28, 2011


Obama Stung by SOTU Plagiarism Rap

By Jack Cashill

Kudos to presidential historian Alvin Felzenberg for his tug on Obama's cape. A Ph.D. from Princeton and the former spokesman for the 9/11 commission, Felzenberg is the first intellectual insider to suggest publicly that President Barack Obama is not the writer the literati have anointed him to be.





In his review of the State of the Union speech posted on the U.S. News website, Felzenberg goes so far as to accuse the president and his speechwriters of plagiarizing it.





"President Obama's second State of the Union address contained enough recycled ideas and lines lifted from speeches of others to make historians wince," writes Felzenberg. "Had the president submitted the text of his second State of the Union Address in the form of a college term paper, he would have been sent forthwith to the nearest academic dean."





As the impressively well-read Felzenberg documents, Obama lifted lines or ideas from the speeches of Dwight Eisenhower, Woodrow Wilson, Mario Cuomo, Margaret Thatcher, Franklin Roosevelt, and John F. Kennedy without attribution.





Obama's awkward pilfering from Kennedy evoked the amateurish days of his writing career before he hooked up with skilled writer, editor, and terrorist Bill Ayers. "I know there isn't a person here who would trade places with any other nation on Earth," said Obama on Tuesday, apparently oblivious to the fact that he was comparing a "person" to a "nation."





In his inaugural address, Kennedy had gotten the analogy right: "I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people." It is likely that Obama finessed the Kennedy quote to avoid a word-for-word theft.





Plagiarism has been something of a problem for the POTUS and the VPOTUS. In his run for the 1988 Democratic nomination, Joe Biden baldly plagiarized a speech by British Labour Party leader Neil Kinnock, even adapting the particulars of his own life to Kinnock's. That run-killing revelation led in turn to the discovery that Biden had also been busted in law school for plagiarism.





During the presidential campaign of 2008, Obama himself stared down a plagiarism rap. After Hillary Clinton had accused Obama of merely giving pretty speeches, Obama responded:





Don't tell me words don't matter, "I have a dream." Just words? "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal." Just words? "We have nothing to fear but fear itself." Just words? Just speeches?"





In 2006, Deval Patrick, then running for governor of Massachusetts, was also accused by his female opponent of pretty speechmaking. Replied Patrick:





But her dismissive point, and I hear it from her staff, is that all I have to offer is words. Just words. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." Just words. "We have nothing to fear but fear itself." Just words.





"Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country." Just words. "I have a dream." Just words.





When confronted with the accusation by a New York Times reporter, Obama replied defensively, "I've written two books. I wrote most of my speeches." This show of literary bravado was enough for the Times. Its reporters refused to see then and refuse to see now how naked their emperor stands as the Obama yarn unravels before them.





As a case in point, in his anticipation of Tuesday's State of the Union address, Matt Bai of the Times casually repeated a fiction now little-believed beyond America's newsrooms -- namely that "Mr. Obama is probably the most talented writer to occupy the office in the television age." Bai then wonders why Obama "hasn't tried to use that talent the way Kennedy capitalized on his personal charm."





As I show in my forthcoming book, Deconstructing Obama, Obama has no talent as a writer. In both of his books, and in all of his important speeches, he has relied on the talent of others. This is not unusual for a politician. What is unusual is that Obama has attempted to deceive America as to the nature of that talent.





"I've written two books," he told a crowd of teachers in Virginia in July of 2008. The crowd applauded. "I actually wrote them myself," he added with a wink and a nod, and now the teachers exploded in laughter. They got the joke: Republicans are too stupid to write their own books.





If Obama's dissembling is unusual, it is not unprecedented. The sainted John F. Kennedy pioneered the waters of literary fraud forty years before Obama, winning a Pulitzer Prize for a book, Profiles in Courage, that he himself did not write.





When legendary muckraker Drew Pearson accused then-Senator Kennedy of fraud on Mike Wallace's national TV show, the Kennedys used the servile family retainer Ted Sorensen to force a retraction from Pearson and Wallace.





Under oath, Sorensen would testify, "I did not write the book for Senator Kennedy." Had the presumed collaborator on Profiles been a figure of comparable disrepute to Bill Ayers -- say, Alger Hiss -- Sorensen's prevarications could not have dampened what would surely have been a media firestorm.





In his 2008 book Counselor, Sorensen would finally admit what he had been leaking since the book was first published: that yes, he "did a first draft of most chapters." He also received half the book's royalties before being bought out of his contract. Still uneasy more than fifty years later about his testimony before Pearson, Sorensen insisted, "I took my oath seriously."





Right, and Obama wrote two books "by myself."

Bush And Obama: Two Men And Their SOTU Word Choices

From The American Thinker:

January 28, 2011


Bush and Obama: two men and their SOTU word choices

K.E. Campbell

An examination of the words used by George W. Bush in his last three State of the Union (SOTU) addresses compared to the ones used by President Obama in his two SOTU addresses plus his address to a joint session of Congress in February 2009 (essentially a SOTU address) is revealing, though the results are not exactly surprising. The table below compares the number of times certain words were used by each president in three comparable speeches.





G. W. Bush

B. Obama

Diff



Word count, total

16,555

20,263

(3,708)



Terror/terrorists/terrorism

65

8

57



Enemy/enemies

34

1

33



Freedom

30

3

27



Military/troops/armed forces

34

15

19



Citizen(s)

30

12

18



Liberty

14

0

14



Extremist(s)

14

1

13



Free [market, people, society, elections, etc.]

14

3

11



Security

30

19

11



Life

25

14

11



Courage

18

7

11



Soldiers/sailors/airmen/marines

13

2

11



Honor

12

2

10



Duty

10

1

9



Opportunity

14

6

8



Army/Navy/Air Force/Marines

9

1

8



Democracy

11

4

7



Society

8

1

7



Justice

9

2

7



Faith

10

5

5



Victory

7

2

5



Trade

11

7

4



Constitution/constitutional

7

3

4



Individuals

4

0

4



Tyranny

3

0

3



Totalitarian

3

0

3



Principle(s)

4

2

2



Rule of law

3

1

2



Self-govern(ment)

2

0

2



Founders/founding/founded

3

2

1



Independence

2

1

1



Personal responsibility

1

0

1



Patriot/patriotism

1

0

1



Happiness

1

0

1



God/Creator

6

6

0



Spirit

8

8

0



Sacrifice

5

5

0



Rights

4

6

(2)



Prosperity/prosper/prosperous

9

13

(4)



Tax(es)

36

53

(17)



Family/families

13

39

(26)









Regarding President Obama's SOTU address a few days ago, some of the combinations of words sounded a little too familiar to Alvin Felzenberg, who has worked for two administrations. In a piece he penned for U.S. News, Felzenberg wrote that the SOTU address "contained enough recycled ideas and lines lifted from speeches of others to make historians wince." Jack Cashill today points out for AT readers that this is a longstanding pattern of Obama's.







To me, one word in particular really stands out in the table above, one that appears in the Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, and the Pledge of Allegiance. The word is liberty. The score: 14-0. A sad shutout.





Posted at 10:03 AM

Obama's Speech Shows He's Out Of Touch

From Dick Morris:

OBAMA SPEECH SHOWS HE'S OUT OF TOUCH




By DICK MORRIS



Published on TheHill.com on January 26, 2011



Printer-Friendly Version



Henry Kissinger, in his memoir of the Ford administration, Years of Upheaval, articulated the central rule of governing: "It is a statesman's duty to bridge the gap between his nation's experience and his vision. If his vision gets too far out ahead of his nation's experience, he will lose his mandate. But if he hews too close to the conventional, he will lose control over events."



Obama has gone from the first of these dangers to the second.



In his first two years in office, he was manifestly so far removed from America's experience and ideals that he lost the election of 2010. His big spending, overregulation, government takeovers and bailouts and healthcare program cost him his mandate. But, in his State of the Union speech, he hewed so close to the conventional that he will now lose control over events.



His speech marks the real end of his presidency and the ascendancy of congressional government led by the House Republican agenda.



A president's major power is his ability to set the national agenda. But Obama's State of the Union agenda was so boring, mundane, conventional and recycled that it will not capture either the national imagination or even center stage. It cannot drown out the drama of Republican efforts to slash spending, repeal ObamaCare, roll back federal regulations, block carbon taxes, kill union card-check and free community banks from regulatory paralysis. The ball is now in the Republicans' court.





The central mission of the Clinton comeback was to eradicate the memory and record of 1993-94. The compelling agenda spelled out by the president captured the nation's attention and blotted out his early failures. Welfare reform, deficit reduction, tobacco regulation and Clinton's second two-year agenda stole the stage from HillaryCare, gays in the military, Waco and the Clinton tax increases.



But as the Republicans repeal or defund the discredited Obama programs of 2009-10, they will assure that these failed initiatives dominate the election of 2012. If Obama opts for stalemate -- his only alternative to surrender if the GOP holds firm -- he will just prolong the shelf life of these issues and assure that they will provide the issues in 2012 -- to his detriment.



On another level, Obama's speech was a plea for a second chance. But his opposition to the Republican agenda will belie his moderation and will show it to be the same sleight of hand as was his vague embrace of change during his presidential campaign. Americans believe in the old adage: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." They will give a president a second chance, but not a third one.



In the meantime, a star was born in the Republican reply delivered by Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan. His articulation of conservative principles was the clearest and most compelling I have heard since Ronald Reagan. The force of his delivery, the reasonableness of his manner and the positive tone with which he undermined and discredited Obama's program were all admirable. When he said that the president's spending programs were "stimulus repackaged as investments" he rebutted the bulk of the president's speech. Ryan, who swears he won't run for president, may find himself drafted.



Obama's proclamation that he had "broken the back of the recession" will inspire howls of disbelief and ridicule throughout the nation. With 9 percent-plus unemployment, how can a president say these words with a straight face?



To Obama's credit, this was the first pro-American speech he has given, embracing American exceptionalism, celebrating the American Dream and honoring our servicemen and women -- boilerplate for any other president, but unusual for this one. His calls for recruiters to be allowed on campus, his rejection of earmarks and pledge to veto them and his embrace of medical malpractice reform were the only good points in his speech.



This speech was not enough to save this presidency.



71 Minutes Of Platitudes And Nonsense

From Floyd Reports:

71 Minutes of Platitudes and Nonsense




Posted on January 28, 2011 by Guest Writer





by Michael Reagan







President Obama’s State of the Union address said more about the state of his approach to governing than it did with the present condition of this nation under his governance.



It was an uninterrupted march of platitude upon platitude, with nary a solution offered to any of the problems facing the United States.



As anyone with one cent’s worth of intellect understands, the United States is not only broke, but up to its thinning hairline in debt to — of all places — China, which despite its Communist government is acting more like a capitalist regime than an old Moscow-style dictatorship.



He was clearly in favor of virtue and opposed to sin in all of its many forms — except, of course, to homosexuality in the armed forces, which seems to have won his unspoken acceptance. It was a joy to behold the stolid reaction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps to Mr. Obama’s apparent acceptance of the legitimacy of same-sex relationships in the armed forces of the United States.



For the most part, the speech was his attempt to disguise his quasi-socialist agenda as being an approach to political and social moderation — not an easy task for a chief executive who has just shoved a version of socialized medicine down the throats of the American people.



With the sole and surprising exception of CNN, which unlike the other networks chose to broadcast the Tea Party response delivered by Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-MN, the president’s speech went mostly unchallenged.



Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., spoke for his party but his remarks were lukewarm compared to those of Rep. Bachmann, which cut right to the heart of the Marxist aspects of the president’s address.



Needless to say, it wasn’t the president’s speech which raised the ire of the so-called mainstream GOP, but Rep. Bachmann’s well-aimed barbs.



She was right on when she declared, “Two years ago, when Barack Obama became our president, unemployment was 7.8 percent and our national debt stood at what seemed like a staggering $10.6 trillion.” She stated, “We wondered whether the president would cut spending, reduce the deficit, and implement real job-creating policies.”



“Unfortunately the president’s strategy for recovery was to spend a trillion dollars on a failed stimulus program, fueled by borrowed money. The White House promised us that all the spending would keep unemployment under 8 percent.



“Well, not only did that plan fail to deliver, but within three months the national jobless rate spiked to 9.4 percent.”



As the perceptive Mike Banerian, one of my valued readers, wrote to me: “From the very beginning of the speech I saw a very different Obama, I saw a new face of a more moderate president. Of course that’s how he wanted to come off; I wasn’t fooled. I have talked with many people who, though [they] found the speech flat, said they liked the moderate stance Mr.Obama has taken. However looking at the context of the speech I found the same old, Liberal, Barack Obama.”



Mr. Banerian wrote that he thought that the overall speech was “weak,” and it was merely “just a mask for his liberal views.” His conclusion: “We need a president and a government that bases its decisions on Capitalism and Democracy, not Socialism and Communism. I hope leaders such as yourself, Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor, and many others take a stand and change America for the better. I love this country, let’s not let the little time we have left to fix this be squandered by a president who looks after his image, over the American image.”



To which all I can say is “Amen.”





GOP Must Leverage Debt Ceiling Vote

From Human Events:

GOP Must Leverage Debt Ceiling Vote


by Jason Mattera



01/28/2011







Do you ever ask yourself, “When will Republicans man-up and force their liberal counterparts in Congress to compromise toward limited government?”



I know I do.



If we’re being honest, conservatives cringe when they hear the word “bipartisanship” because a) It usually involves John McCain and b) Republicans end up caving to liberal demands, not vice versa.



But now we’re at a moment where all that can change. There are two votes that must take place in the next few months that Republicans can use to force genuine cuts to government spending. They address extending the “continuing resolution” and whether or not to raise the “debt ceiling”.



“Those pieces of legislation are getting all the way to the finish line, and so that’s why [we] have the leverage,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R.-Ohio) in the second part in an interview with HUMAN EVENTS.



(Watch the interview below.)







“Real, dramatic cuts have to be a part of any debt ceiling vote that takes place. That’s what the American people demanded,” he added.



Jordan heads the Republican Study Committee and has offered a framework of cutbacks in his Spending Reduction Act of 2011 that would save 2.5 trillion over 10 years, but would only shed $100 billion this year.



“That’s one-thirteenth of the deficit. We’ve a $1.3 trillion deficit, that’s just one-thirteenth. So we have got to be focused on as much spending cuts as we can do because the situation is just that serious.”



Keep in mind that it is Obama, not the Republicans, who would be responsible for “default” or a “shutdown” if the Republicans attach a significant spending freeze and reduction amendment to a debt ceiling bill or continuing resolution, and Obama vetoed it.



Republicans control the House and made significant gains in the Senate in the midterms. Therefore, Democrats should cave in to their demands.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Mr. Mattera is the editor of HUMAN EVENTS and the author of Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation (Simon & Schuster). He also hosts The Jason Mattera Show on News Talk Radio 77WABC. Previously, he was the Spokesman for Young America's Foundation and a TV correspondent for Michelle Malkin. Follow Jason on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.





Thursday, January 27, 2011

Political Cartoons: Obamao

From Gateway Pundit:

Obama's Love Affair With Chairman Mao: Part Deux

From The American Thinker:

January 27, 2011


Obama's Love Affair with Chairman Mao: Part Deux

Stella Paul

Remember when Obama celebrated his very first White House Christmas by hanging Chairman Mao on his tree? After all, nothing says, "I'm a traditional American," better than a shiny ball emblazoned with the face of a mass murdering Communist, sparkling like an angel's wings on Christmas morning.





Alas, Obama's paltry poll numbers forced him into all sorts of tiresome charades, like decorating his Christmas tree without any Communists this year, and ostentatiously shlepping around a book on Ronald Reagan.





But true love is hard to hide; it keeps blazing through in all the little things. Like publicly bowing to Mao's successor, Hu Jintao, with the trusting submission of a lovesick puppy. Hey, it's just a nuclear summit... it's not like Obama needed to look strong or anything!





And then there are this week's adoring little signals: delighting in pianist Lang Lang's musical performance at the White House of a famous Chinese ballad. It turns out the song, "My Motherland," is a glorious celebration of the slaughter of American "jackals" (otherwise known as drafted American soldiers in the Korean war). The ChiCom tyrants loved it, and the whole world got to laugh at us pathetic suckers. Obama was in heaven!





Now think back to junior high school, when all your friends figured out your latest crush, because you couldn't stop talking about him. Well, check out Obama's State of the Union! There he was, once again sending gooey love signals to China -- "home to the world's largest private solar research facility, and the world's fastest computer." And its limpid, lustrous eyes aren't bad either!





As Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit notes, "It was historic. Obama cheers Maoist song at White House State Dinner, Praises Commie China in the State of the Union...All in One Week."





America breathlessly awaits the day that Obama loves us with as much ardor as he loves the communist Chinese.

Posted at 02:32 PM